How to Write a Timetable for a Dissertation

Most graduate programs require students to write a dissertation on their original research. Graduate students identify an area of interest and ask a professor with expertise in that area to supervise the research.

The student then asks other faculty members to form a committee, with the supervising professor as the chair. Check out best dissertation writing services. The student submits a research proposal for approval. The student should then develop a timetable for writing the dissertation and submitting it to the committee.

Setting up a Timetable:

1. Select a calendar, chart or planner and enter the deadlines for each step of your dissertation. Review the dissertation requirements from your university's graduate program to determine the deadlines.
2. Work backwards from the date in which you intend to graduate. List all deadline dates: when you must submit your dissertation to the graduate school; when you must defend your research; when you should give the final draft to the committee; when you should submit the first draft to the committee. You now know how long you have to write the dissertation.
3. Set up a schedule for writing each section before the first draft needs to go to the committee. Specify each step and determine the approximate time it will take. For example: write research proposal and methodology; collect data; write details of methods; analyze results; write results; write discussion and conclusions. Allow time for revisions.
4. Set aside a specific time every day to work on your dissertation. Choose your most productive time. For example, if you work best in the morning, set aside morning time to write. Allow enough time to complete each section. Write first the sections that come easiest. Allow more time for more difficult sections.

Research Proposal:

1. Allow time to read dissertations former students have written as models for your work.
2. Set aside a large block of time to read literature in your research area and write a comprehensive literature review for your dissertation proposal. Set out the research question you will address; determine how it relates to earlier research and how it will advance the field. Allow time for reading and thinking about the question. This dissertation proposal will become the first chapters of your dissertation.
3. While reviewing the literature, select a supervising professor to direct your research. Select other members of your committee based upon advice from your supervising professor, with an eye toward finding experts to aid in your research. Find out research proposal writing service. For example, if you are weak in statistics, ask a statistician.

Dissertation Sections:

1. Set aside time to write each section of the dissertation. Your introduction or review of the literature will have been already written for your research proposal.
2. Write your method section before or during the research-conducting phase. This section should follow directly from your proposal.
3. Set aside enough time to conduct the statistical analyses and to conduct additional analyses after you review the first results with your supervisor. Don't format tables and graphs until you and your supervising professor decide on what to include.
4. Give yourself plenty of time to write the discussion and the conclusions. Allow extra time to contemplate on the conclusions and to indicate how they relate to prior research.

How to Write a Timetable for a Dissertation - Tips & Warnings:

• Choose your supervising professor and members of your committee on how well they will support you, as well as upon their areas of expertise.
• Relate your discussion to your introduction.
• Allow more time than you think you will need for every step.

Post Credit: Ehow

Revise as You Write - Assignment Writing

If a professional writer uses many drafts, why don't most amateurs? Most novice writers assume that writing is done perfectly the first time.

This is just not true. The finished piece and the first draft can be dramatically different. At other times the draft and final might be very similar. Get cheap assignment writing service uk and enjoy your academic life.

Another mistake that amateur writers make is that they are afraid to be ruthless when they are editing. Because it can be a struggle just to make the word count, they don't want to delete sentence or paragraphs that might be written poorly.

Good writers are both inventors and editors. Two parts. The first part is to come up with the material - the innovators stage. The editing part is the reviewing and revising stage, where most the deleting should take place.

This applies when you are writing assignments or essays as well. Often a student will get an essay topic and research, research, research. Once they feel that they have enough research, then they will try to write the essay.

This is not the ideal way to write an essay. The student should begin writing immediately. An essay plan is helpful but this should be brief and act as a guide or prompt.

It is also very helpful to have a friend or family member read your essay. A fresh set of eyes and perspective might be just what you need.

Do not be afraid of criticism from those who read your writing. Must proofread and edit your dissertation assignment before submitting. You can get best dissertation editing services online.Take that feedback and make your writing fantastic.

Post Credit: EzineArticles

Mexico authorities ‘knew about attack on students as it happened’

Leaked government documents say federal officials did nothing to stop disappearance and probable massacre of missing 43

Activists protest in Mexico City on 10 December over the missing 43 students. Photograph: Xinhua/Rex Features

Mexican federal authorities had real-time information of an attack on a group of student teachers by corrupt local police, but did nothing to stop the disappearance and probable massacre of 43 people, according to new evidence published by the news magazine Proceso. Findout essay writing help online.

Based on leaked government documents, the new allegations are likely to further fuel public anger at the government of the president, Enrique Peña Nieto, which has insisted that federal authorities share no responsibility for the students’ disappearance.

So far, 79 people have been arrested over the presumed massacre on 26 September: all are allegedly linked to a network of corrupt local politicians and police officers in the southern city of Iguala or members of a drug gang called Guerreros Unidos.

Parents of the missing students have long alleged that federal law enforcement institutions must have known what was happening and attacked them for not intervening. Scepticism over the government account of the massacre – and frustration with the sometimes haphazard federal response – has propelled a string of protests against the government in recent weeks.

The Proceso investigation is based on documents from an initial state-level investigation which was curtailed when federal authorities took over in early October. The Guardian has not been able to verify the magazine’s account.

The documents include a detailed record of the student’s movements made by a government information command post – known as a C4 – as the group left their college in Ayotzinapa in the town of Tixtla.

They were travelling by bus to Iguala, about two hours’ drive away, intending to commandeer more buses from the city to use in a later protest.

C4 (Control, Command, Communications and Computation) posts are run by state governments, but are charged with collecting and distributing information to all local and federal law enforcement agencies within a particular area.

According to the Proceso account, the C4 informed the head of the federal police unit stationed in Iguala when the students arrived at the city’s bus station at 9.22pm. About 20 minutes later, the C4 reported that gunfire had broken out, Proceso reported – the opening volleys of what turned into several hours of violence. Get cheap uk dissertation writing services.

Anabel Hernández, one of the report’s authors, told MVS Noticias radio station: “When we see that the federal government and the state government were following the students since they left the college in Ayotzinapa, it becomes very difficult to think that everything else that happened was an accident.”

The most contentious claim in the story was that federal forces participated in the attack – an allegation which has not been taken up by survivors of the attack.

Enrique Galindo, the head of the federal police, said there is no evidence that federal officers had participated in the events of the 26 September inside Iguala. But Galindo admitted that the 16 federal police officers stationed in the city were aware of the students’ movements as they approached Iguala.

“We knew, of course, because they were in buses and they were travelling on federal highways. That seems to me to be normal. It would be worse not to know,” Galindo said in an interview on the Televisa TV network. “We did not participate inside the city.”

The report also questions the official version that Iguala’s mayor, José Luis Abarca, ordered the attacks for fear the students would disrupt an event to promote his wife María de los Angeles Pineda’s political ambitions.

According to Proceso, the event finished at 8pm – more than an hour before the students reached Iguala.

Proceso’s allegations came days after a group of scientists from the National Autonomous University of Mexico raised further questions over the official version of events.

The attorney general, Jesús Murillo, says the students were detained by municipal police and then handed over to the Guerreros Unidos gang who killed them at a rubbish tip before burning their bodies. Such was the intensity of the fire, Murillo said, that the bodies were reduced to ashes and bone fragments.

In their report last week, the scientists said that evidence from the supposed crime scene did not support the theory of a mass funeral pyre.

The report by the scientists, released on 11 December, said that the pyre would have required 33 tons of logs, or nearly 1,000 tyres, to reduce 43 bodies to the remains presented as evidence by the attorney general. If tyres had been used, they said, this would also have left behind considerable amounts of metal.

Popular fury over the massacre – and recurring allegations of state involvement – have helped bring hundreds of thousands of protesters to a string of anti-government demonstrations over recent weeks.

About 21 people were hurt, including students, parents of missing students and federal police officers, after serious clashes broke out during a protest in Chilpancingo on Sunday.

This article was amended on 19 December 2014. An earlier version said the most contentious claim in the Proceso account was that federal forces participated in the massacre. That has been amended to say the most contentious claim was that federal forces participated in the attack on the students. The name of the MVS Noticias radio station has also been cdiorrected, and an attribution, which was lost in the editing process, restored to make clear that Enrique Galindo was speaking on the Televisa TV network.

 Post Credit: Theguardian